Sign in Subscribe

Topic

Petition Strategy

A collection of 42 issues

An award can recognize you without proving what your work changed

My petition included recognition such as the Financial Times Top 100 BAME Leaders in Technology and L'Etudiant 100 Young People. Those records could establish that recognition happened.

My longest sentences were hiding the weakest evidence

Some of the most convincing sentences in my early petition drafts were also the hardest to prove. They sounded efficient because they compressed a role, an organization, a result, and a conclusion into one line.

I treated every critical-role claim as two separate cases

The leading or critical role section of my EB-1A petition looked like one argument. While drafting it, I found it more useful to treat it as two.

A number needs a noun before it can support a claim

Numbers made parts of my EB-1A petition easier to understand. Founders of the Future ran more than 80 events and reached more than 4,000 aspiring entrepreneurs from 2016 to 2021.

Your most impressive exhibit does not have to come first

Evidence order is not a ranking of your achievements. It is a route for the reader.

Write the case theory before the cover letter

Before I drafted my EB-1A cover letter, I forced the case into two sentences. The first sentence named my field: community building in technology and entrepreneurship.

A timeline can show continuity without pretending every year is equal

Before I drafted final merits, I put thirteen years of evidence on a timeline. The short version of that exercise is simple: list the dated facts, sources, and exhibits before trying to write a story about sustained work.

A team result is not the same as your role in it

Founders of the Future ran more than 80 events and reached more than 4,000 aspiring entrepreneurs. Those are results of the initiative.

Your petition needs a dictionary before it needs another paragraph

A long petition can become inconsistent one small phrase at a time. The field has one name in the introduction and a slightly different name in final merits.

Original contribution needed outcomes, not activity

The original contribution criterion was one of the easiest places to confuse effort with evidence. I had done a lot.